Leadership turnover and financial inclusion policy in the UK: Assessing impact of prime ministerial changes on access to banking credit and fintech adoption (2021-2026)

Hamisu Ali; Scholastica John Itodo; Teri John; Gbenga Festus Babarinde4; Dungrit Peter Gelle; Wandiya Raymond

doi:10.68359/sjbem.651.412026

Authors

Hamisu Ali 6Adamawa State University, Mubi, Faculty of Social Sciences, Communication and Media Studies, Department of Economics, Adamawa State-Nigeria
Scholastica John Itodo Adamawa State University, Mubi, Faculty of Social Sciences, Communication and Media Studies, Department of Economics, Adamawa State-Nigeria.
Teri John Adamawa State University, Mubi, Faculty of Social Sciences, Communication and Media Studies, Department of Economics, Adamawa State-Nigeria.
Gbenga Festus Babarinde4 Banking and Finance Department, Modibbo Adama University, Yola, Nigeria.
Dungrit Peter Gelle Federal University of Lafia, Department of Economics, Nassarawa State Nigeria.
Wandiya Raymond Adamawa State University, Mubi, Faculty of Social Sciences, Communication and Media Studies, Department of Economics, Adamawa State-Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68359/sjbem.651.412026

Keywords:

Banking Credit; Financial Inclusion; Fintech Adoption; Leadership Turnover; Political Stability.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Prime Ministerial leadership turnover on financial inclusion policy in the United Kingdom, with particular emphasis on access to banking credit and fintech adoption during 2021–2026. The study adopts an Interrupted Time-Series (ITS) and segmented regression approach, complemented by multiple-leadership-transition analysis, event-study estimation, and Granger causality tests. Financial inclusion is measured through access to banking credit, while fintech adoption captures the expansion of digital financial services. The ITS results indicate that both banking-credit access and fintech adoption recorded significant positive pre-transition trends. However, leadership turnover generated significant immediate negative effects on banking-credit access (β = −2.146; p < 0.05) and fintech adoption (β = −1.874; p < 0.05). The post-transition trend for banking-credit access was negative and significant (β = −0.173; p < 0.05), whereas fintech adoption recorded a positive and significant post-transition trend (β = 0.126; p < 0.05), indicating stronger recovery. The multiple-transition results show that the Sunak–Starmer transition produced the largest immediate adverse effects on both outcomes. Event-study results further reveal significant short-term declines following leadership transitions, with effects diminishing over subsequent periods. Granger causality tests establish unidirectional causality from leadership turnover to financial inclusion, fintech adoption, and Open Banking, while reverse causality is insignificant. The study concludes that Prime Ministerial turnover temporarily disrupts financial inclusion and digital-finance development, particularly access to banking credit, although fintech demonstrates greater resilience. The study recommends strengthening policy continuity, regulatory stability, and institutional transition mechanisms to sustain financial inclusion during periods of political leadership change.

References

Alesina, A., Özler, S., Roubini, N., & Swagel, P. (1996). Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138862

Babina, T., Bahaj, S., Buchak, G., De Marco, F., Foulis, A., Gornall, W., Mazzola, F., & Yu, T. (2025). Customer data access and fintech entry: Early evidence from open banking. Journal of Financial Economics, 169, Article 103950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103950

Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024

Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., & Terry, S. J. (2020). COVID-induced economic uncertainty (NBER Working Paper No. 26983). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26983

Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Mizen, P., Smietanka, P., Thwaites, G., & Abrahams, S. (2025). The economic impact of Brexit (NBER Working Paper No. 34459). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34459

Bonsu, E. M. (2025). Lexical epistemic markers in Ghanaian parliamentary discourse: A corpus-based diachronic analysis (2005–2024). Applied Corpus Linguistics, 5(3), Article 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100161

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally.

Cornelli, G., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Rau, P. R., Wardrop, R., & Ziegler, T. (2023). Fintech and big tech credit: Drivers of the growth of digital lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 148, Article 106742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106742

Dasilas, A., & Karanović, G. (2025). The impact of FinTech firms on bank performance: Evidence from the UK. EuroMed Journal of Business, 20(1), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-04-2023-0099

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of COVID-19. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1897-4

Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766

Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1993). The study of public policy processes. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 1–9). Westview Press.

Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01707.x

Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003

Linden, A. (2015). Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. The Stata Journal, 15(2), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1501500208

Lopez Bernal, J., Cummins, S., & Gasparrini, A. (2017). Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(1), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098

Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296528

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

Ozili, P. K. (2021). Financial inclusion research around the world: A review. Forum for Social Economics, 50(4), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2020.1715238

Ozili, P. K. (2025). Bank non-performing loans research around the world. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 9(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-09-2024-0103

Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2020). Political cycles and stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 128(11), 4011–4045. https://doi.org/10.1086/710532

Philippon, T. (2019). On fintech and financial inclusion (NBER Working Paper No. 26330). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26330

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001

Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406

Sahay, R., von Allmen, U. E., Lahreche, A., Khera, P., Ogawa, S., Bazarbash, M., & Beaton, K. (2020). The promise of fintech: Financial inclusion in the post COVID-19 era (Departmental Paper No. 20/09). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513512242.087

Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 460–484). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0022

Thakor, A. V. (2020). Fintech and banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 41, Article 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2019.100833

Tok, Y. W., & Heng, D. (2022). Fintech: Financial inclusion or exclusion? (IMF Working Paper No. 2022/080). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400208645.001

Xie, G., Chen, J., Hao, Y., & Lu, J. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment behavior: Evidence from China’s five-year plan cycles. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(10), 2977–2994. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1673160

Yin, X., Wei, X., Irfan, M., & Yasin, S. (2023). Revitalizing organizational efficiency: Unpacking the relationship between CEO turnover, research and development, and pay-performance sensitivities in the financial sector of Pakistan. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310578

Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2020). Decentralized finance. Journal of Financial Regulation, 6(2), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaa010